USPTO serial 75784986
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sioux Falls, SD
Sioux Falls, SD
Sioux Falls, SD
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mikolean M. Longacre
MIKOLEAN M LONGACRE LONGACRE & ASSOCIATESP O BOX 16148FERNANDINA BEACH, FL 32035UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorship in the field of fuel, antifreeze, deicing salt, automotive cleaning preparations and detergents, lubricants, metal cable wire, hoses and belts, power operated pressure sprayers, roller bearings, power tools, metal seals for machines, hand tools, batteries, battery chargers, trouble lights and extension cords, electric heaters, electric lube dispensing equipment, freon recyclers, antifreeze recyclers, transmission conditioning recyclers, power washers, rotary lifts, air compressors, automotive lighting, automotive parts, exhausts, and paper products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 10, 1963 |
| 040 | Manufacture of fuel, antifreeze, deicing salt, cleaning preparations and detergents, lubricants, metal cable wire, hoses and belts, power operated pressure sprayers, roller bearings, power tools, metal seals for machines, hand tools, batteries, automotive lighting, automotive parts, exhausts and paper products to the specifications of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 10, 1963 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |