USPTO serial 75785102
OPTISERV EYECARE DATA INTERCHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTISERV EYECARE DATA INTERCHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY HOENIG
GARY HOENIG HOENIG & ASSOCIATES2777 YULUPA AVE STE 222SANTA ROSA, CA 95405-8784UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business and data management, namely, the collection, storage, analysis, and transmission via computer networks of information relating to orders for eyecare goods and services, including spectacle lenses, contact lenses, eyeglass frames, care products, accessories, and other related items and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | INSURANCE BENEFITS AND CLAIM MANAGEMENT services, NAMELY, THE DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR INSURANCE BENEFITS, THE ORGANIZATION OF INSURANCE BENEFIT APPLICATION RULES AND LIMITS INTO A SEARCHABLE CATALOG STRUCTURE, AND THE VALIDATION AND TRANSMISSION OF INSURANCE CLAIMS, EXPLANATIONS OF BENEFITS, AND REMITTANCE ADVICE VIA LOCAL AND GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic data interchange services to participants in the eyecare industry, namely, electronic transmission by patients and their representatives, care providers, laboratories, manufactures, vendors, distributors, and insurance companies of messages, data, and documents via local and global computer information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Feahr, Christopher J.
- Other trademarks owned by Feahr, Christopher J.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named OPTISERV EYECARE DATA INTERCHANGE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |