USPTO serial 75785864
HOW2HQ.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOW2HQ.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Edward Woodson
W EDWARD WOODSON HOW2HQ.COM, INC3811 TURTLE CREEK BLVDSTE 600DALLAS, TX 75219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promotional services, namely, providing rebate processing, rebate fulfillment and promotion management services for manufacturers, vendors and retailers; providing information regarding rebates for consumer goods and services in the nature of rebate availability, rebate conditions and rebate status, via a web site on the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing information via the internet in the fields of educational materials for lifestyle, home and work improvement | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |