USPTO serial 75785867
KICKING ASP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KICKING ASP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIANE M. RRED
DAINE M REED KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP620 NEWPORT CTR DRSIXTEENTH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, computer information storage, and retrieval hardware, network computers, public and private access computer terminals, and kiosks, platforms and booths for public and private access computer terminals; computer systems, communications systems and computer information storage and retrieval systems all comprising computers, computer software for operating such systems, network access and communications cards and terminals, modems, dedicated and public terminals and computer peripherals, which provide access to data and information on global computer networks, enterprise computer networks, local area networks, proprietary computer networks and the World Wide Web (WWW) and which provide access to business and personal applications software, general purpose application software programs and program development software for use by others on a metered, usage or flat fee basis; computer software for implementing the foregoing, and user manuals sold as a unit | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | technical consulting services in the fields of computer systems, computer software, networks, security, servers, Internet and World Wide Web (WWW) design and access, e-mail system design and implementation; website design, development, implementation, maintenance, hosting services of others; computer software development services for others; computer network consultation and development services for others; and communications systems consultation and development services for others; Leasing designing, operating and renting or making available for a fee public and private access computer terminals, computers, communications systems, network computers, network computer systems, e-mail systems, a global computer information network and World Wide Web (WWW) access facilities; providing access to a global computer information network, enterprise networks and internal computer networks, and the World Wide Web (WWW) via dedicated and public terminals, and access to business and personal applications and general use software and program development software for use by others on a metered, usage or flat fee basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |