USPTO serial 75785868
EMUSIC.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMUSIC.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meredith Pikser
Meredith Pikser Reed Smith LLP599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio and video tape players and recorders; laser disc players and recorders; radios; headphones; computer software for creating, manipulating, converting, transferring and playing electronic fields containing music, video and sound; musical sound recordings; Music, audio, video and multimedia entertainment content, namely, music,musical entertainment, shows, concerts, performances, comedy performances, movies, movie sound tracks and radio and television broadcasts recorded on discs, tapes and CD's and in electronic and computer-readable file format; Downloadable music, audio, video and multimedia entertainment content, namely, music, musical entertainment, shows, concerts, performances, comedy performances, movies, movie sound tracks and radio and television broadcasts distributed electronically, via a global computer network, the world-wide web and/or through dial-up or network access connections | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Distributorship services featuring CD's, audio and video recordings, electronic files and downloadable files, all featuring music, musical entertainment, shows, concerts, performances, comedy performances,movies,movie sound tracks and radio and television broadcasts distributed electronically, via the Internet, the world-wide web (WWW)and/or through dial-up or network access connections; music publishing services; promotion of bands and music events of others, and presentation of shows and concerts; retail store services and on-line services featuring music, musical entertainment, shows, concerts, performances, comedy performances, movies, movie sound tracks and radio and television broadcasts; computer services, namely, providing a searchable computer database and reference library in the field of music, musical entertainment, shows, concerts, performances, comedy performances, movies, movie sound tracks and radio and television broadcasts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |