USPTO serial 75786624
SCAN PAY GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2003
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCAN PAY GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FUJITSU TRANSACTION SOLUTIONS, INC.
FRISCO, TX
Other trademarks owned by FUJITSU TRANSACTION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Drew M. Wintringham
Steven T. Shelton CLIFFORD CHANCE US LLP31 West 52nd StreetNew York, NY 10019-6131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SELF-SERVICE CHECK-OUT SYSTEM COMPRISING A SCANNER AND PAYMENT ACCEPTING MODULE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 28, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FUJITSU TRANSACTION SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Optimal Robotics Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Optimal Robotics Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Optimal Robotics Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SCAN PAY GO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |