USPTO serial 75786663
SODA-CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3098423Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2006
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SODA-CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Zug, CH
6300 ZUG, CH
CH-6300 ZUG, CH
CH-6300 ZUG, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Greenberg
Scott Greenberg LOCKE LORD LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CENTERNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | FILLING OF CARBON DIOXIDE GAS BOTTLES AND CONTAINERS FOR USE WITH APPARATUS AND MACHINES USED IN THE IN-HOME MIXING OF BEVERAGES, IN PARTICULAR, CARBONATED BEVERAGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Soda-Club (CO2) Atlantic GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Soda-Club (CO2) Atlantic AG
- Other trademarks owned by Soda-Club (CO2) Atlantic GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Soda-Club (CO2) Atlantic GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SODA-CLUB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 30, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 19, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |