USPTO serial 75786749
5K
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2854058Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2004
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 5K?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A. HUGHES
Mary L. Shapiro Law Office of Mary L. Shapiro244 California Street, Suite 507San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DESIGN, DESCRIPTION AND TESTING OF COMPUTING DEVICES, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND CODE, NAMELY SOFTWARE FOR DESCRIBING, DESIGNING, MODELING, SIMULATING, DEBUGGING, DEVELOPING, VERIFYING, COMPUTING DEVICES, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND CODE, NAMELY, MICROPROCESSOR CORES; SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES, NAMELY, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, CIRCUIT CHIPS, MICROPROCESSORS, AND LITERATURE SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH; MICROPROCESSOR CORES AND USER MANUALS AND LITERATURE SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |