USPTO serial 75786898
MTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jaye G. Heybl
MARIA CECILLE D AZARCON ROBERT BOSCH CORPORATION2800 S 25TH AVEBROADVIEW, IL 60155UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic vehicle diagnostic, measurement and analysis equipment, namely engine analyzers; Electronic hand held apparatus, namely engine analyzers for testing the vehicle performance and isolating vehicle faults | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |