USPTO serial 75786939
5KC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 24, 2004
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 5KC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY L SHAPIRO
MARY L SHAPIRO Law Office of Mary L. Shapiro244 California Street, Suite 507San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for design, description, and testing of computing devices, computer hardware and code, namely software for describing, designing, modeling, simulating, debugging, developing, verifying computing devices, computer hardware and code, namely microprocessor cores, microprocessor cores* ; * and data sheets and literature sold as a unit therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 28, 2001 |
| 016 | PAMPHLETS RELATING TO COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 23, 2000 |
| 042 | licensing of intellectual property; providing information relating to computer technology, hardware and computer code, including microprocessor cores | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 25, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIPS Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MIPS Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MIPS Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named 5KC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |