Drawing for EMATTER

USPTO serial 75787404

EMATTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EMATTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIE ANNE MATHESON

JULIE ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW ET AL1300 I ST NW FL 6-8WASHINGTON, DC 20005-7102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely computer software development tools for use in construction and operation of stores accessed via computer networks and for use with on-line information services relating to books, manuals, and multimedia productsACTIVE—
035Retail store services and wholesale distribution services featuring books, manuals, and multimedia products; on-line information services, namely providing purchasing information and product pricing of books, technical manuals, and multimedia products; computerized online search and ordering services relating to books, manuals, and multimedia productsACTIVE—
041Electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others in digital format, in a wide variety of fieldsACTIVE—
042On-line information services, namely reviews of books, technical manuals, and multimedia products; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data and locating web sites on computer networks; designing and implementing network web pages and electronic commerce web sites for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; and computer consultation servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance