Drawing for STARSHIP CREATOR

USPTO serial 75787438

STARSHIP CREATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STARSHIP CREATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn A Erickson

KATHRYN A ERICKSON SUGAR FRIEDBERG & FELSENTHAL30 N LASALLE ST STE 2600CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software, namely, computer software for creating educational curriculums and learning games for use by educators, students and parents both in and out of the classroom, via a global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2002ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Oct 4, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 4, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 1, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance