USPTO serial 75788045
FICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Hewett
SCOTT HEWETT PATENT ATTORNEY400 W 3RD ST # 223SANTA ROSA, CA 95401-7601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | INTEGRATED MULTI-MEDIA BUSINESS NETWORKING SERVICES, NAMELY PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS USING MULTI-MEDIA ADVERTISEMENTS DISTRIBUTED OVER THE INTERNET, PREPARING AND DISSEMINATING MULTI-MEDIA ADVERTISING, PROVIDING BILLING SERVICES FOR OTHERS, AND PROVIDING BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES REGARDING MULTI-MEDIA PRODUCTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | INTEGRATED MULTI-MEDIA BUSINESS NETWORKING SERVICES, NAMELY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MULTI-MEDIA PROGRAMS AND DATA VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | INTEGRATED MULTI-MEDIA BUSINESS NETWORKING SERVICES, NAMELY ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF MULTI-MEDIA PROGRAMS AND INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | MULTI-MEDIA EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TRAINING REGARDING DEVELOPING ELECTRONIC COMMERCE OVER AN ELECTRONIC NETWORK, PROVIDING TRAINING REGARDING HOW TO INTEGRATE GRAPHIC IMAGES AND TEXTUAL CONTENT IN PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS CARRIED OVER AN ELECTRONIC NETWORK, AND PRODUCTION OF MULTI-MEDIA TRAINING MATERIALS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fair, Ronald J.
- Other trademarks owned by Fair, Ronald J.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FICS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |