USPTO serial 75788334
THE KERNEL POPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE KERNEL POPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terri S. Flynn
KENT A LEE REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN, SC1000 N WATER ST STE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | prepackaged unpopped popcorn intended for preparation in a microwave oven | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |