Drawing for TRANSCAN

USPTO serial 75788469

TRANSCAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSCAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J Wadyka Jr

1750 TYSONS BLVD STE 1200MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic transportation fare collection equipment comprised of a biometric user identification system, namely, biometric sensor capturing real time data corresponding to a stable physical characteristic of a person, which provide either verification or identification of the identity of the people by computer analysis of the physical characteristics, and associated computerized accounting system, namely, data link to a financial institution and/or credit transaction processing center to process credit transactions, verify creditworthiness and transmit requests to debit accounts and computer database to store the biometric data collected by the biometric user identification systemACTIVE—
036Providing transportation fare collection services employing electronic biometric identification of users in conjunction with electronic accounting for collection and remittance of faresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 4, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance