Drawing for EUREKA:INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 75788509

EUREKA:INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EUREKA:INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerry W. Mills

JERRY W MILLS BAKER & BOTTS, LLP200 1 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-2980UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in connection with enterprise information portals, namely, software for personalized, browser-based, integrated searching, analyzing and creating a wide variety of reports using an organization's internal information and intelligence over computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 7, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 7, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 26, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 17, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance