USPTO serial 75788610
AIRFLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2574217Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 28, 2002
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIRFLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin C. Fliesler
MARTIN C FLIESLER FLIESLER MEYER LLP650 CALIFORNIA ST 14TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software which enables wireless carriers to provide customers with location-based services and content; computer software which enables mobile portals and wireless carriers to provide customers with electronic commerce services; personal information management software for use on wireless communication devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2000 |
| 042 | Application service provider featuring software in the field of electronic commerce namely programs which allow users of Wireless Application Protocol-enabled wireless communication devices to utilize e-commerce services of others and to retrieve commercial information based on geographic location, via a wireless communication network; Application service provider featuring software that integrates third party applications on Wireless Application Protocol-enabled wireless communication devices via a wireless communication network; Application service provider featuring computer search engine software that compares travel time, determines distance, identifies geographical and man-made boundaries, and provides the quickest route to a location of interest to users of Wireless Application Protocol-enabled wireless communication devices via a wireless communication network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 8, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |