USPTO serial 75788621
EMRO.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMRO.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Moose
RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY & MANNING, PAPO BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND INVENTORY CONTROL FOR SEARCHING FOR PARTS, VIEWING PRODUCT INFORMATION, SPECIFICATIONS AND GRAPHICS, PLACING ORDERS ELECTRONICALLY VIA SECURE CONNECTION, DOWNLOADING VENDOR INFORMATION, PRODUCT PARTS NUMBERS AND DESCRIPTIONS INTO INVENTORY INFORMATION AND OBTAINING ORDER CONFIRMATION AND SHIPMENT TRACKING STATUS INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS ELECTRONIC CONSULTATION AND TRANSACTION SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, IN THE FIELD OF FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AND INVENTORY CONTROL FOR SEARCHING FOR PARTS, VIEWING PRODUCT INFORMATION, SPECIFICATIONS AND GRAPHICS, PLACING ORDERS ELECTRONICALLY VIA SECURE CONNECTION, DOWNLOADING VENDOR INFORMATION, PRODUCT PARTS NUMBERS AND DESCRIPTIONS INTO INVENTORY INFORMATION, AND OBTAINING ORDER CONFIRMATION AND SHIPMENT TRACKING STATUS INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DATASTREAM SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by DATASTREAM SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named EMRO.COM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |