USPTO serial 75788622
MAINTENANCE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAINTENANCE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Moose
RICHARD M MOOSE DORITY & MANNING PAPO BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in facilities maintenance and inventory control for searching for parts, viewing product information, specifications and graphics, placing orders electronically via secure connection, downloading vendor information, product parts numbers and descriptions into inventory information and obtaining order confirmation and shipment tracking status information | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business electronic consultation and transaction services via a global computer network, in the field of facilities maintenance and inventory control for searching for parts, viewing product information, specifications and graphics, placing orders electronically via secure connection, downloading vendor information, product parts numbers and descriptions into inventory information, and obtaining order confirmation and shipment tracking status information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |