Drawing for CARILLON BEACH

USPTO serial 75788634

CARILLON BEACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARILLON BEACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence L Carnes

1673 W PAUL DIRAC DRTALLAHASSEE, FL 32310UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and Business Services via a Global Computer Information NetworkACTIVE—
036Real Estate Leasing ServicesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
037Real Estate Development Services, Namely Planning, Laying Out and Development of Residential and Commercial CommunitiesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
042Providing Information in a wide variety of fields by means of a Global Computer Information NetworkINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 10, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance