USPTO serial 75788639
PERFECT TURKEY EVERY TIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2000
- Examiner
- EHARD, ANDREW
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFECT TURKEY EVERY TIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily E. Harris
Emily E. Harris Davis, Brown, Koehn, Shors & Roberts666 Walnut Street, Suite 2500Davis Brown Law FirmDes Moines, IA 50310Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fresh, refrigerated, and frozen turkey; turkey portions; turkey based meats, cooked and further processed turkey | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 14, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 30, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 25, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |