USPTO serial 75788728
LONGABERGER VILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LONGABERGER VILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan A. Sims, Esq.
BRYAN A SIMS ESQ SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY LLP8000 TWRS CRESCENT DR 14TH FLVIENNA, VA 22182UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Longaberger Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by Longaberger Company, The
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LONGABERGER VILLAGE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |