USPTO serial 75788830
BULLSHIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BULLSHIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN C/O TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST 16TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BEER MINERAL WATERS, AERATED WATERS, CARBONATED WATERS, FLAVORED WATERS AND OTHER NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, PUNCHES, SOFT DRINKS, SMOOTHIES AND LEMONADES; SPORTS DRINKS; ENERGY DRINKS; ISOTONIC DRINKS, HYPERTONIC DRINKS AND HYPOTONIC DRINKS, FOR USE AND/OR AS REQUIRED BY ATHLETES AND THOSE ENGAGED IN ACTIVE OR STRESSFUL SPORTS AND ACTIVITIES; FRUIT JUICES AND FRUIT DRINKS, VEGETABLE JUICES AND VEGETABLE DRINKS; SYRUPS, POWDERS, CONCENTRATES AND EFFERVESCENT TABLETS FOR MAKING DRINKS AND BEVERAGES; NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS AND DRINKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, EXCLUDING BEERS, NAMELY RUM, VODKA, GIN, TEQUILA, WHISKEY, -BRANDY SPIRITS, DISTILLED SPIRITS AND WINE; ALCOHOLIC HOT AND MIXED BEVERAGES, NAMELY, ALCOHOLIC PUNCHES AND ENERGY DRINKS, MULLED WINE AND ALCOHOLIC CIDERS; WINES, POTABLE SPIRITS AND LIQUEUR; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE MIXES, NAMELY PRE-MIXED COCKTAIL BASES, POWDERS, SYRUPS, CONCENTRATES AND EFFERVESCENT TABLETS FOR MAKING ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS; COCKTAILS AND APERITIFS CONTAINING POTABLE SPIRITS OR WINE; WINE COOLER BEVERAGES, ALCOHOLIC LEMONADES, FRUIT DRINKS AND SMOOTHIES, WINE PUNCHES AND WINE COCKTAILS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CATERING; ACCOMMODATION OF GUESTS, NAMELY HOTEL AND LODGING SERVICES; RESTAURANT AND BAR SERVICES, NAMELY OPERATION OF BARS, PUBS, CAFES, TAVERNS AND OTHER PERMANENT, TEMPORARY, PORTABLE OR MOBILE ESTABLISHMENTS SERVING BEER, WINE AND/OR ALCOHOLIC OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; RESTAURANT AND BAR SERVICES, NAMELY OPERATION OF SNACK BARS, RESTAURANTS, DINERS, CAFES AND OTHER PERMANENT, TEMPORARY, PORTABLE OR MOBILE ESTABLISHMENTS SERVING FOOD, BEVERAGES AND/OR SNACKS OF ALL TYPES; MEDICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, MEDICAL CARE; HEALTH CARE; BEAUTY SALON SERVICES, NAMELY BEAUTY CARE AND PERSONAL GROOMING SERVICES; VETERINARY SERVICES; SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH SERVICES; LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FOOD AND BEVERAGES, RESTAURANTS AND BAR SERVICES, HEALTH AND FITNESS, SPORTS, SPORTS TRAINING AND PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, NAMELY DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS; PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR EXHIBITIONS AND FAIRS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |