Drawing for DOMINATOR

USPTO serial 75788897

DOMINATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOMINATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MITCHELL KAMARCK

MITCHELL KAMARCK ROSENFELD MYER & SUSMAN, LLP9601 WILSHIRE BLVD 4TH FLBEVERLY HILLS, CA 91740UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment in the nature of sporting events and instruction in sports featuring hockey star Dominik Hasek; entertainment in the nature of a web site featuring news, feature stories and information in the field of hockey; entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of sports featuring hockey star Dominik HasekACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance