USPTO serial 75788940
EMCONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMCONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wesley L. Austin
WESLEY L AUSTIN MADSON & AUSTIN15 W S TEMPLE STE 900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Firmware and/or computer software to control and/or acquire data for consumer and/or industrial applications from electronic equipment through local and/or global computer networks and instruction manual sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | Sep 25, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by emWare, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC WORKS, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by emWare, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EMCONNECT
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |