Drawing for NETGEN

USPTO serial 75789025

NETGEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETGEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carla B. Oakley

CARLA B OAKLEY BROBECK PHLEGER & HAXISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Magnetically encoded credit cards, store value cards and debit cards used by youth to facilitate non-cash transactionsACTIVE—
035youth buying clubs; promoting to youth the sales of goods and services of others by awarding purchase points for web site visits and purchases; promoting to youth the sale of goods and services of others through the distribution of printed material and promotional contest and games; promoting to youth the goods and services of others by preparing and placing website links on a website accessed through the Internet; youth gift registry servicesACTIVE—
036Credit card, stored-value card and debit card use-management services; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of credit card;, stored-value card, debit card and account purchases, balances and payment data; providing secure, supervised and restricted electronic credit card, stored-value card and debit card payment transaction services; youth financial planning and financial management servicesACTIVE—
038Providing on-line chat rooms and bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning consumer products and purchases for youths and topics of general interest for youthACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance