USPTO serial 75789115
B2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with B2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-78183 Hufingen/Benia, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS M. CHAMPAGNE
THOMAS M CHAMPAGNE IP Strategies, P.C.1048 Dead Run DriveMcLean, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software including computer programs, computer program systems, computer program libraries and databases in the field of enterprise resource planning; machine-readable data carrier equipped with computer software in the field of enterprise resource planning | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | consultancy in the field of information technology, electronic commerce, and enterprise resource planning | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational Training services in the field of data processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | installation of computer software; maintanance of computer software; updating of computer software; development of computer software for others; testing and analysis of data processing systems for use in the field of enterprise resource planning; rental of computers and computer software; engineering services; computer programming for others; providing rental of data processing equipment; and computer consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Baurer Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named B2
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |