Drawing for UNDERNEATH

USPTO serial 75789401

UNDERNEATH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNDERNEATH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel S Schecter

DANIEL S SCHECTER LATHAM & WATKINS633 W 5TH ST STE 4000LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely underwear, loungewear, sleepwear undergarments, bras sax, robes, thermal underwear, t-shirts, slippers lingerie and hosieryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 9, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 4, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 18, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance