USPTO serial 75789676
BAMBOO CORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAMBOO CORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur H. Seidel
HARRIET E PERKINS DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP18TH AND CHERRY STSONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6996Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PREPARED MEALS CONSISTING MAINLY OF MEAT OR FISH | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | PREPARED FOODS, NAMELY, RICE, PASTA, WHEAT, CEREALS AND CEREAL-BASED PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BREAKFAST CEREALS, READY TO EAT CEREAL DERIVED FOOD BARS AND SNACK BARS, CEREAL-BASED SNACK FOODS; PREPARED MEALS CONSISTING MAINLY OF RICE OR PASTA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Optimal Food Processing Research Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Optimal Food Processing Research Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BAMBOO CORE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |