USPTO serial 75789901
DOROTHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOROTHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elise A. Tenen-Aoki
ELISE A TENEN-AOKI WARNER BROS4000 WARNER BLVDBRIDGE BLDG 5TH FLBURBANK, CA 91522Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | BATH LINENS, NAMELY, FABRIC BATH MATS, BATH TOWELS AND WASH CLOTHS; BED LINENS, NAMELY; BED BLANKETS, BED CANOPIES, BED PADS, BED SHEETS, BED SPREADS, PILLOW CASES, COMFORTERS, DUVET COVERS, MATTRESS COVERS, DUST RUFFLES, CRIB BUMPERS, MOSQUITO NETS, PILLOW SHAMS AND BED SPREADS; CURTAINS; DRAPERIES; KITCHEN LINENS, NAMELY, BARBECUE MITTS, CLOTH DOILIES, CLOTH NAPKINS, DISH CLOTHS, FABRIC TABLE CLOTHS, KITCHEN TOWELS, FABRIC PLACE MATS, OVEN MITTS, WASHING MITTS, FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS, POT HOLDERS AND CLOTH COASTERS; HANDKERCHIEFS, QUILTS, AND GOLF TOWELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |