USPTO serial 75790049
EXPERTS ON DEMAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPERTS ON DEMAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna C. Silva
ANNA C SILVA333 MARKET ST STE 3200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Market research in the field of broadcasting; conducting an automated interactive market research surveys via telephone and global computer network; computerized database management services; distributorship services featuring videotapes | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Digital satellite television broadcasting; electronic video and audio streaming transmission via a global computer network; computer services, namely, providing on-line chatrooms for transmission of message among computer users concerning art, biotechnology, business, computers, electronics, entertainment, finance, law, business management, manufacturing, medicine, pharmaceuticals, science, sports, technology and telecommunications over digital satellite television and global computer networks; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning continuing professional education and professional topics | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Electronic archiving of audio and video data for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, education courses at the continuing professional education level in the field of art, biotechnology, business, computers, electronics, entertainment, finance, law, business management, manufacturing, medicine, pharmaceuticals, science, sports, technology and telecommunications over digital satellite television and global computer networks; education services, namely, conducting classes, workshops, seminars and conferences in the fields of art, biotech, business, computer electronics, entertainment, finance, law, business management, manufacturing, medicine, pharmaceuticals, science, sports, technology and telecommunications over digital satellite television and global computer network; providing an online electronic database on global computer networks in the field of an archived, indexed and chapterized pre-recorded videos whereby users can search the database by key words and other fields and broadcast video clips as chosen by users | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing an on-line interactive computer database in the field of technology; computer services, namely, creating indexes and archives of information on computer networks for others via a global computer network; website development services for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Technology Education Network, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Technology Education Network, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EXPERTS ON DEMAND
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |