USPTO serial 75790743
SUPERCLUBS BREEZES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2805160Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2004
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPERCLUBS BREEZES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Georgetown, KY
GEORGETOWN, GRAND CAYMAN, KY
Georgetown, KY
Georgetown, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHY SILBERTHAU STROM
KATHY SILBERTHAU STROM CAHILL GORDON & REINDEL LLP1990 K STREET, N.W., SUITE 950WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VRL INTERNATIONAL LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SC LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by VRL INTERNATIONAL LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by VRL INTERNATIONAL LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SUPERCLUBS BREEZES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 11, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |