USPTO serial 75791479
BIOTECHPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOTECHPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy K. DuCharme
NANCY K DUCHARME LAW OFFICE OF NANCY K DUCHARMEPO BOX 222TINLEY PARK, IL 60477-0222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific equipment, namely, a laser doppler optical system for the measurement of biological motion simultaneously in time and frequency domains; an acousto-optic laser scanning system for the measurement of multiple flourescence and chemiluminescence signals from an array of biological cell samples for the investigation of signal transduction and the identification of chemicals used in pharmaceuticals; a fluorescence detection based optical system for the measurement of dynamic fluid fluxes of substances across biological and other membranes; and a fiber optic laser doppler endoscopic system for the measurement of biological motion | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of scientific equipment, namely, an aerosol delivery system for aerosol delivery to the respiratory tract, to the order and specification of others; and the customized design and manufacture of instrumentation and devices for the generation, processing, and characterization or measurement of liquid and solid aerosols | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |