USPTO serial 75791790
LIVEMANUALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIVEMANUALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jerusalem 91450, IL
Jerusalem 91450, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jefferson F. Scher
JEFFERSON F SCHER CARR & FERRELL LLP2200 GENG RDPALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in the design, development, prototyping, promotion and providing information for a wide variety of products and systems; computer software for use in creating products and systems; computer software for use in creating product and prototype demonstration applications; computer software for use in developing interactive content for local area networks, web sites, and global computer networks; computer software for creating electronic user manuals; computer software allowing to perform natural language queries; user manual supplied as a unit with the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |