USPTO serial 75791792
LIVEPRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIVEPRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jerusalem 91450, IL
Jerusalem 91450, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheila S. Fox
SHEILA S FOX CARR & FERRELL LLP2225 E BAYSHORE RDSTE 200PALO ALTO, CA 94303Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in the design, development, prototyping, promotion and providing information for a wide variety of products and systems; computer software for use in creating products and systems; computer software for use in creating product and prototype demonstration applications; computer software for use in developing interactive content for local area networks, web sites, and global computer networks; computer software for creating electronic user manuals; computer software allowing to perform natural language queries; user manual supplied as a unit with the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |