Drawing for OLE OPTIMAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

USPTO serial 75791879

OLE OPTIMAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2900063Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 2, 2004
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLE OPTIMAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Priscilla L. Sulham

D. Joseph Clark1700 Westlake Avenue NorthSuite 600Seattle, WA 98109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATIONSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJul 13, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2009C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Mar 10, 2009CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 23, 2009CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jul 26, 2008PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 2, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 7, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 21, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 21, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 6, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 9, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance