USPTO serial 75791912
CELLOCATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELLOCATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta T2E 7N6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ken J. Pedersen
KEN J PEDERSEN PEDERSEN & COMPANY, PLLCP O BOX 2666BOISE, ID 83701-2666UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications equipment, namely global positioning devices, receivers and computers used for locating wireless transmitters | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of telecommunications equipment used for locating wireless transmitters | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Installation and maintenance of telecommunications software used for locating wireless transmitters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |