Drawing for RWE

USPTO serial 75792455

RWE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RWE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David S Safran

DAVID S SAFRAN NIXON PEABODY, LLP8180 GREENSBORO DR STE 800MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for generating energy, namely, electric generators; and machines for the application of energy, namely, motors not for land vehicles; and wind turbinesACTIVE—
009Computers; communications software for connecting computer network users and/or global computer networks; and computer telephony software; and machines for distribution of energy, namely, switchgears and electric control gearsACTIVE—
011Sewage treatment plantsACTIVE—
035Cooperative advertising and marketing of materials produced from waste; and logistics management in the field of waste material transportation for othersACTIVE—
036Insurance brokerage; financial analysis and consultation; financial services, namely, money lending, investment fund transfer and transaction services, providing on-line stored value accounts in an electronic environment; real estate brokerage; leasing of real estate; and real estate managementACTIVE—
037Custom construction and/or repair of solid waste landfills, railways, buildings and sport facilities; land development services, namely, planning and laying out of residential and/or commercial communities; environmental remediation services, namely, disposal of waste; waste disposal for others; and real estate developmentACTIVE—
038Providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services; telephone communication servicesACTIVE—
039Transportation of passengers and/or goods by air, boat, rail, bus; logistic services, namely, transportation of waste for others; public utility services, namely distribution or transmission of electricity, water, gas and heat; garbage collection, namely, trash pickup servicesACTIVE—
040Production of energy; waste treatment; environmental remediation services, namely, soil waste and/or water treatment services; destruction and incineration of wasteACTIVE—
042Mining and mineral exploration services; database development services; data encryption services; engineering services; monitoring security systems; security guard services; construction drafting; waste management; hazardous waste management; landscape gardening design for others; landscape gardening; product development; urban planning; reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with environmental zoning laws and regulations; energy usage management; lawn care services, and civil and underground engineeringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 30, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 10, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 10, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 10, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance