Drawing for BFIT

USPTO serial 75792564

BFIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BFIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIE A. KATZ

JULIE A KATZ WELSH & KATZ, LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ 22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029food products namely whey-based foods, dairy-based foods, namely ice cream, milk, cheese, vegetable-based foods, namely vegetable chips, snack dips, dairy-based dips, bean dips, fish, fruit-based foods, namely chips, trail mix, snack bars, frozen fruit bars, processed bee pollen for food, soy-based food beverage for use as a milk substitute, dried and canned soy beans, yogurt-based foods namely beverages, canned and dried fruits and vegetables, and packaged entrees of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetablesACTIVE—
030food products namely herbal-based foods, namely beverages, teas, and processed herbs, soy-based ice cream substitute, soy sauce, cereal-based ready to eat food bars and snacks, food flavorings, bread-cracker-cookie combination packages, shakes, bakery goods, grain-based foods and beverages, candy, chocolate, coffee, ice cream, frozen yogurt, pasta, rice cakes, and teaACTIVE—
032beverages namely smoothies, syrups and powders for beverages, soda water, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks, mixes for making soft drinks, fruit-based drinks, sports drinks, and mineral-based drinksACTIVE—
042food preparation and contract food servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 16, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 22, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 22, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance