USPTO serial 75792894
LE PARADIS DU FRUIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LE PARADIS DU FRUIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75006 PARIS, FR
75016 PARIS, FR
75016 PARIS, FR
75004 PARIS, FR
75004 PARIS, FR
75006 PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Virgil H. Marsh
VIRGIL H MARSH FISHER CHRISTEN & SABOL1725 K ST NW STE 1401WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, frozen fruits, fruit pulp, fruit salads, stewed fruit, fruit chips, fruit sauce; tinned fruit; jellies, jams; milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; milk-based beverages; vegetable salads, vegetable soup mixes, cooked vegetables, dried vegetables, tinned vegetables | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1982 |
| 030 | Fish and poultry sauces; candy; ice creams; edible ices; sorbets; milkshakes made from sorbets; ice milk and frozen yogurt; frozen confections; coffee; tea | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2005 |
| 031 | Fresh fruits; live, cut and dried plants; live, cut and dried flowers | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2005 |
| 032 | Fruit and vegetable juices; nonalcoholic drinks, namely, sports drinks, carbonated soft drinks, noncarbonated soft drinks, drinking water, fruit drinks; syrups, concentrates and powders for making fruit drinks; nonalcoholic fruit cocktail mixes | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2005 |
| 042 | Restaurant services, cocktail lounge buffet services | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOUZON, Gilles
- Other trademarks owned by LOUZON, Serge
- Other trademarks owned by LOUZON, Serge
- Other trademarks owned by LOUZON, Claude
- Other trademarks owned by LOUZON, Claude
- Other trademarks owned by LOUZON, Gilles
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LE PARADIS DU FRUIT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |