USPTO serial 75793521
DIAMOND.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIAMOND.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN ANDERSON
BRIAN ANDERSON OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & P.C.1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3454UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail store services in the field of diamonds, watches and jewelry | ACTIVE | Oct 18, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 8, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |