USPTO serial 75793963
MAXIVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig S. Summers
Craig S. Summers Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | THEATRICAL MOTION PICTURE EQUIPMENT FOR 35MM FILMS, NAMELY, 35MM MOTION PICTURE PROJECTORS; EDITING TABLES; FILM SYNCHRONIZERS; CONTACT PRINTERS; 35 MM FILM MOVEMENT MECHANISMS FOR MOTION PICTURE PROJECTORS, NAMELY, 35MM FILM GATES, CONSTANT SPEED SPROCKETS, INTERMITTENT SPROCKETS, VARIABLE SPEED MOTORS, SERVOMOTORS, AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR CONTROLLING THE OPERATION OF THE VARIABLE SPEED MOTORS; SOUND HEADS; SOUND READERS; SOFTWARE AND CONVERTERS TO CONVERT DIGITAL SOUND TO ANALOG SIGNALS; 35MM FILM AND/OR SOFTWARE; CONTAINERS FOR STORING AND TRANSPORTING EXPOSED 35MM MOTION PICTURE FILM; PRE-RECORDED AUDIOTAPES, DVD AND DVD-AUDIO FEATURING SOUNDTRACKS OF 35MM MOTION PICTURE FILMS WITH NO DIRECT CONNECTION TO A THEATRICAL MOTION PICTURE OR MUSIC CREATED INDEPENDENTLY BUT SUBSEQUENTLY USED AS PART OF THE SOUNDTRACK FOR A MOTION PICTURE (E.G. MUSIC VIDEOS AND MOVIES THAT USE PRE-EXISTING MUSIC); TELECINIE AND DIGITAL SCANNERS FOR 35MM FILMS, NAMELY, SCANNERS FOR TRANSFERRING 35MM FILM TO VIDEO AND VIDEO TO 35MM FILM; SCANNING SOFTWARE FOR TRANSFERRING 35MM FILM TO VIDEO AND VIDEO TO 35MM FILM; MOTION PICTURE CAMERAS USED TO PHOTOGRAPH MOVIES FOR 35MM FILM RELEASE, OR FOR VIDEO DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR THE OPERATION OF AND FOR MONITORING THE OPERATION OF THE FOREGOING 35MM MOTION PICTURE EQUIPMENT; DEVELOPED THEATRICAL 35MM MOTION PICTURE FILM, NAMELY, 35MM MOTION PICTURE FEATURE FILMS, AND VIDEOTAPE | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR OF THEATRICAL MOTION PICTURE EQUIPMENT FOR 35MM FILMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | 35MM THEATRICAL MOTION PICTURE PRODUCTION AND POST PRODUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY, 35MM FILM TO VIDEO TRANSFER IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING CONVERSION OF 35MM MOTION PICTURE FILM TO VIDEOTAPE; VIDEO TO FILM TRANSFER IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING CONVERSION OF 35MM MOTION PICTURE FILM TO VIDEOTAPE; 35MM FILM DUPLICATION; 35MM FILM DEVELOPMENT; 35MM FILM EDITING; AND PRODUCTION OF 35MM RELEASE PRINTS AND 35MM FILM NEGATIVES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MaxiVision Cinema Technology
- Other trademarks owned by MaxiVision Cinema Technology
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named MAXIVISION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| May 9, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |