Drawing for HEARTLINK

USPTO serial 75794029

HEARTLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HEARTLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E Lynn Perry

E LYNN PERRY THELEN REID & PRIEST LLPP O BOX 190187SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-0187UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010medical instruments, namely, heart monitoring and/or controlling equipment (either external to or implanted within the user) for data collection from the surface of the body or from within the body, wireless or hardwired transfer of such data to a device worn by or proximate to the user, processing, and/or storage of such data in that device, communication of such data, and/or related analysis by terrestrial and satellite means to remote receiving and monitoring stations, receiving of data from remote locations by the device worn or proximate to the user and wireless or hardwired communication of such data to a device or devices either on the surface or implanted with the userACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 4, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 21, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 31, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance