Drawing for PATHOIMAGERY

USPTO serial 75794963

PATHOIMAGERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PATHOIMAGERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, L.L.C.Two Liberty Place, 50 South 16th Street22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035healthcare utilization and review services, healthcare cost review services and healthcare cost containment servicesACTIVEJun 23, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance