USPTO serial 75794981
SENIOR SAFE HELPLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENIOR SAFE HELPLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W Hazard Jr
JOHN W HAZARD JR WEBSTER CHAMBERLAIN & BEAN1747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing information by telephone and distributing written information to senior citizens concerning health questions including nutrition, exercise, vitamin supplements, pharmacology, drug interaction, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, abuses by spouses or adult children, geriatric dentistry, alternative medicine, and providing to senior citizens referrals on these and similar issues to appropriate local authorities and agencies for further assistance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL
- Other trademarks owned by NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL
- Other trademarks owned by Elder Safe, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SENIOR SAFE HELPLINE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |