USPTO serial 75795013
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO AND INTERACTIVE MEDIA RENTAL,SALES AND DISTRIBUTION THROUGH USE OF THE INTERNET AND WIRELESS MEDIUM | ACTIVE | Sep 23, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |