USPTO serial 75795990
SHOP RANGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOP RANGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Grand Prairie, TX
SHELL ELECTRIC METG. (HOLDINGS) COMPANY LTD.
CHAI WAN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, HK
Other trademarks owned by SHELL ELECTRIC METG. (HOLDINGS) COMPANY LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gordon E. R. Troy
GORDON E R TROY GORDON E R TROY PCP O BOX 368CHARLOTTE, VT 05445-0368UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Vacuum cleaners namely, wet/dry vacuums | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |