Drawing for BRAIDED ACCENTS

USPTO serial 75796239

BRAIDED ACCENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2438164Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2001
Examiner
OH, HYUN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAIDED ACCENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Muriel M. Burke

Muriel M. Burke Owens & Crandall1859 N. Lakewood DriveSuite 104Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Building materials made of wood, namely, moldings, door frames, window frames, rails and wainscottingEXPIREDFeb 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 1, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Oct 1, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 3, 2008CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Mar 31, 20078.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Mar 30, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Mar 8, 20078.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Mar 8, 2007ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 9, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 31, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 27, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 12, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 17, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance