USPTO serial 75796423
MINIMALIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINIMALIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM JELINEK
WILLIAM JELINEK ESTEE LAUDER INC767 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | makeup, namely, foundation, blush, powders for the face and eyes, cover up creams, concealers, eye shadow, eye pencils, under eye treatment in the form of creams, gels and lotions, lipsticks, lip gloss, lip pencils, lip conditioner, mascara, lash enhancer, lash primer, brow pencils, brow moisturizing cream, gel and lotion, make-up remover, nail lacquer, nail polish and nail cream; fragrances, namely, perfume, cologne, body creams, lotions and gels, shower gel, bath gel, soap for personal use, bath grains, bath oils, bath gels, deodorants, antiperspirants; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, essential oils for personal use, skin care lotions, moisturizing creams and gels, tonics, skin masks, toners and refreshers, soaps, cleansers, powders for personal use, shaving creams, lotions and gels, after-shave creams lotions and gels; hair care preparations, namely, shampoo and conditioners for the hair, hair gels, hair sprays, hair thickeners; sun care preparations, namely, sun block preparations, skin bronzing sprays, creams, gels and lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |