USPTO serial 75796459
REALSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REALSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westlake Village, CA
Westlake Village, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M.D. Harris
M D HARRIS KLEINBERG & LERNER LLP2049 CENTURY PARK E STE 1080LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate brokerage and agency services and consulting services dealing with the purchase, sale and other transactions of real property | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |